Will PTGui read RAW files from camera XXX?ģ.10. My images were taken with a (e.g.) 28mm lens, but after optimization, PTGui reportsģ.8. Can I use PTGui to create virtual tours?ģ.5. Can PTGui work with 16-bit images from start to finish (ie, no 8-bit conversion)?ģ.4. My lens database is empty, is that normal?ģ.3. Is PTGui or the documentation available in other languages?ģ.2. How can we set up a proxy server so that PTGui can be activated?ģ.1. Our network does not have internet access but we want to use the floating license. Can a license be activated for all users on a computer?Ģ.17. Out internet connection is behind a proxy server. PTGui says 'failed to activate your license'. How can we deploy PTGui without activating each computer manually?Ģ.14. We are running PTGui on multiple computers in a network environment. I'm planning to switch from a PC to a Mac, is that possible?Ģ.13. On how many computers is my license activated?Ģ.12. How can I transfer my license to another computer?Ģ.10. My computer is not connected to internet. Can we use an on-premise license management server to manage the floating license?Ģ.6. For the floating license, what happens if the computer crashes or goes offline while PTGui is running?Ģ.5. I tried to enter my license key, but it doesn't workĢ.4. Technical support questions should be posted to the PTGui Support Forum.Ģ.1. related to purchasing, downloading, software activation) Get an answer from the PTGui authors or from other users.įor non-technical questions (e.g. If this does not solve the problem, post your technical support questions to the The answer to your question may already be listed here. If you have a question or problem please first check the list of frequently asked questionsīelow. Tutorials for advanced usage of PTGuiĬontains links to more tutorials, written by users of PTGui.ĭetailed documentation for every feature and parameter is included with PTGui: in PTGui choose Upgrade at a reduced price, or free of charge,ĭepending on the date of the original license purchase. Some people might get results with this, and other reviews seems to support this, but I'm certainly not getting good results, and I believe that allowing the user to pre-set-up relative positions, sizes, and co-incidence points would give the program a better chance to select proper stiitch points.Before you look any further, make sure that you are running the latest version of PTGui. (And how about a switch turning OFF all features that require JFIF information, as not everybody just plugs their camera in and drops the photos immediately into a stitcher.) And my scans don't have typical lens, focus, and dof distortions. I could use a tool to do this with my hundreds of multi-page scans that I deal with on many projects, but it actually has to work. In the time it took to fail with the two shot photo, I could have stitched it in photoshop, with only the central distortion requiring a correction. This has got a very long way to go for anything I could actually use. The 2x2 multipage scan turned into something resembling a doily (or mirrored cylinder art), arranged 1x4.Īnd the very simple 2 image photo with 1/3 overlap, it couldn't even put together, just saying it couldn't find a panorama. The 2x2 photo of a steppe-villatge was hilarious, as it put 3 of the shots exactly on top of each other and fish-eyed them, and put the lower-right image immediately to the right of the stack. I gave it a 1x2 and 2x2 photographic and a 1x3 and 2x2 multipage scan. On top of that, the interface is gawd-awful. I tossed 4 projects which I am currently working on at it, and the process, in all the different set-ups I gave it, failed miserably. So yes it's costly, and indeed in the beginning I myself thought with so many contenders five times cheaper there was just no reason even to try it. Then I gave AutoPano a try, on the demo version.Įverything worked perfectly, including in these old cases where you won't ever go back to that location and hadn't the tripod and failed it all.Īutopano is a lifesaver, and I must say some of its extra features ("little planet" views…) are very worth too. Then, I pushed it with less-than-perfect series of photos (among which various taken handheld, with different focals…) and of course it failed, also creating ghosts in difficult cases (say, a beach, waves not being at the same places between two shots). Indeed, some months ago I spent quite a time trying everything around, but within a lower price range: I converged to PanoEdit and bought it in spite of its lock to apple store. Incredibly efficient while still simple to use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |